was made. The phrase "Imperial Troops" in par. 6 onglet also to have been corrected, as that suffe
meant to cover troops raised in
India to form part of
is misleading
at any rate, if
Un Imperial
we shall have to
in regard
Gring
Jam afraid plead a printer's erron
to this point, but betin replying ? Send to W. Opozitart
reference
Indian
to par. I of the "desp" & the first resolution what kind
flation troops it is in contemplation to apparently the Colony
raise,
އ
would not object to tikler bath and to Madrassées.
2. As to 2nd Resolution,
and of
W... which argues against 952
Madden Higgs of getting
par. 3 to and
any rebate
on a
deficiency
in the
farrism unless the cast fables
is so great that the
deficiency is so
cost actually falls below the Colonial Contribution.
I am afraid
the W.O. & Treasury will not budge
but before sending tints W.0.
on this posit
? Wait for their reply to the letter
Barracks.
sent to W.0. the other das
the same question at the Straits. 3. As to the 3rd Resolution"","
279
separate correspondence is still taking place, in which we
supporting the view,
are
view put for
in this Resolution (G. W. Home
17 may
3. As to Backs, the matter is complicated.
Gylis GW des Vaux'; new perperal track
the W.D. & dias ant of
the centre of the
wen altogether (aleich dont you
que
westerday) the (olony bitting the for thems
not only new barracks, but all supplementary
Establishments. The 3rd Resolution only
Estinalis Un 84 acres in Victoria
as
bing with #$3,000,000 (at least) And if text is so, I fear the G.Wis des Vicux's
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.